Contra Strategos

I might never record that video in opposition to Sofa Legion Strategist, but after mulling it over for a few weeks now, I feel like I could share the general draft. Let’s see…

I. Introduction. What are my political thoughts? They are as far away removed from Western Eurasia as imaginable. I do not feel at home with either of the countries, blocs, religions or online collectives. And yet, it’s not as if I had a specific, intricate, developed ideology. It’s just that my worldview is based on the simplest concept - that of the survival of one’s own collective. I would posit that any creed that forfeits its own biological basis will be actively harmful or at the very least callous in the long run. Memes only succeed when they are bound in service to the genes. This is why my ideal is Juche Korea - they sing a thousand songs about their racial heroes, they put their faith in the line of Mangyongdae, and the Party itself would be exterminated if the NPCs lost their war. Win-win-win!

(What does give me pause is that the DPRK was created by a fluke of history. While Kim Il Sung persevered for decades in the frozen wastes of Manchuria exterminating his Japanese racial enemies, it’s not like Hitler’s will was weaker, or Tojo’s. But then again, as Ryan Faulk once quipped about environment vs heredity, it’s akin to splitting the dough from the time required to cook it. And only Fate is the chef.)

II. On genocide. Russians have this innate Christcucked fear of genocide. They call it “Nazism” - a buzzword as steeped in madness as “racism” is in the Anglosphere. It all has the same old idealistic roots in the “rights” and “rules” - those of man, or of war. All nonsense. The only true laws are those of physics. Those who die are deemed wrong by Nature. No ideology which does not presuppose the survival of its carriers can be considered sane or stable in the long run. It will take time for it to die, but die it will.

In this case, the Russians so often talk about loving your nation but not hating the others. And I question, why not? Sure, it posits that your people need resources first and foremost. But if there is a way to steal them from your neighbours, why not steal? Why not rob? Why not prevent any future retaliation by murdering the owners? Sure, it is all great to make oneself higher by your own dint. But why not keep others lower? In short - why would anyone work for his own enemies’ benefit? It is called treason. But in more mundane terms, where these retards lack agency - madness.

(Of course, we may never know for sure which of the paths will lead to victory, for the future lies hidden in the fog of war with reality. But these fucks are clear in their literal servitude towards their enemies, be it the spiritual Israel amongst the Jesus-worshippers, or the world commune among the communists, or the global free market of liberals. Culture usually doesn’t hide its dogmas, it can’t be more complex than the lowest common denominator. It is not a blood libel to assume that by cutting the genitals the Egyptians intend to cut the genitals.)

And now, why can’t we bring up the successful cases of genocides? Look towards the Chams of Indochina - used to be a Hindu realm, now utterly subsumed by the Viet (who have since been successfully settling the hilltribe lands in recent decades). Or consider the Armenians of Anatolia - exterminated, they can no longer pose threat to the Turk. Or the Jews of Middle Europe - they have stopped existing in that area, and now Poland is monoethnic. The Serbs of Kosovo, and the Albanians of Serbia have been mutually ethnically cleansed, and so have been the Greeks and the Turks from the corresponding nations. Examples abound.

Of course, our dear Strategos is talking about the “common people”. But that term only applies under universalist, Abrahamic ethics. Where each hominin is supposed to carry a soul - and which souls are intrinsically equal in value before the eyes of their Hebrew angel Yeshua. The veracity of Semitic tales notwithstanding, it is a thoroughly idealistic view and thus strays exceedingly far from the blood & soil reasoning, so simple and natural. The foreigner is the enemy by virtue of eating resources which might be eaten by your tribe. So he may and should be put to death… in the opportune hour.

That said, there are cases where assimilation is worthwhile - be it in the stories of American Nordic immigration where the stock is largely the same, or in pan-Slavist considerations. Hell, even Korea under Japan would have fared better than if exterminated by the Aryans. But even in cases of brotherly nations, there isn’t an inherent wrongdoing in internecine strife. After all, collectives may be split ad infinitum. If the beylik of Osman is destined to create an empire, or the village of Rome, or the city of Moscow, or the counts in Berlin, so the merrier! And history doesn’t shy away from closely-related people warring to see who emerges on top - Prussia & Austria, Morocco & Algeria, Türkiye & Iran, Eritrea & Tigray, all is fair in love and war.

Where exceptions arise is when faulty memetic software makes certain collectives fight against their own self-interest - what happened with the Anglosphere in WW2 where the British chose actively to kill their empire rather than unite with the Aryan Germans against Russia and America. Or how the later Russians decided to give away their empire for the love of money - genociding their own nation in the process. But such cases seem to be most common in the West of Eurasia under the sign of the cross.

III. How to win the Russo-Ukrainian war.

Now, I also thought of the possible avenues I could suggest to either of the sides, using my point of view. For Russia, it would be obvious - either conquer the Ukraine in 2014 without a shot fired, and if at the present point, the war could be won in 15 min by genociding the 20 mil. Ukrainians by expending at most 200 nuclear warheads. What is Strategos’ counter-argument? That it is evil, for one, and that Russia would be considered evil by… umm, Asians. Yes, those same Asians who exterminated millions of Armenians, Chams, Dzungars… How thoroughly amusing! These Christcucks are projecting their own mental virus onto healthier races. Even then, in the YouTube comments I found folks bringing up how America has been loved by the world and especially the Japanese for using nuclear weapons thereon. My heart flutters when seeing such pagan residues, really.

(On this note, I could bring up the point that the Dnieper bridges being destroyed would lead to a starvation of the entire Left-Bank Ukraine, which neither Strelkov, nor Rolo Slavskiy, nor Strategos seem to consider, for whatever reason. Maybe because genocide to them is such an alien concept that they really can’t imagine proper collective death?)

And as to the Ukraine? If we discount the Jewish power in Kiev, and the cultural suicide, the Ukraine still remains a vaguely Aryan country which might even house a pagan European revival - although Kosovo is a much better candidate. The Ukraine could definitely win if they:
1) removed the female rights to attaining education, owning property, emigrating or divorce;
2) mobilised children from 15 onward.

Of course, the Ukraine is losing as it remains a desiccated corpse flailing lukewarmly by Western cash inflows, but it’s utterly lacking in any vitality, any ideology save for Mammon-worship, any future vision aside from whoredom. If one gave the Ukrainian men taste of state-mandated pussy, along with an actual stake in their land’s development (such as removing all foreigners from Kiev and Dnepropetrovsk), of course the people would be reinvigorated.

P.S. I seem to have utterly skipped over the conspiracy theories - Strategos’ ponerology-esque decrying of the psychopaths in the American CIA, NeoFeudalism’s fears of total banker control, or Rolo Slavskiy’s visions of oznei haman in the dismembered Krokus ears. My total response would be - bring it on! So far, the alleged Jewish élite has demonstrated its utter ineptitude at exterminating even the Arab vermin. Or even Slavic - how else would I be writing the current entry? Again, these folks simply can’t think of killing…

…But of course, both the Russian and Ukrainian visions are unthinkable to the masses. It’s merely a case of Christian corpses animated for another Jewish theatre. Which is fine by me. There is definitely a place for the masses and the intellectuals, but when the masses are totally beholden to collective suicide, a certain disinterest may be excused.

The Eurasian rim is long. Christians will get their wish, and then Nature will take its course amongst the sacred groves of the Juche Idea. Jerusalems come and go, but Pyongyang is eternal.

Mr. Paektu - Ri Kyong Nam (1982)