Disparate thoughts

NeoFeudalism - Anti-natalism - Biodeterminism - Secret of the runes - Lucid dream directed flight experience!

Table of contents
1. My comment on NeoFeudalism.
2. My comment on anti-natalism.
3. On biodeterminism.
4. Castaneda-esque Russian rune magick (고이가야).
5. Lucid dream directed flight experience!

© Adûnâi (2025-06-18)
https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/greater-israel-is-happening/comment/126877011

Back when I used to be inspired to write an idiosyncratic nonsense of a blog, I made an autistic "meme" about how there are only two poles to the world - Pyongyang and Jerusalem.
https://archive.vn/amqGj

(Also here - https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=Adûnâi)

1. My comment on NeoFeudalism.
© Adûnâi (2025-06-15)
https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/greater-israel-is-happening/comment/126212300

Epigraph: "Europe and the world will be too small from now on to contain a war. With such weapons humanity will be unable to endure it..." Adolf Hitler (7th July, 1943, Peenemünde - Walter Dornberger)

Rurik Skywalker has banned me, so I cannot even respond to him, what a vaginal UI censorship! To respond to him - in fact, user Unreconstructed Yeoman's behaving in a triggered manner looks anti-Christian in my eyes! Why? Because it is precisely Christianity which suppresses the otherwise human animalistic instinct of blind loyalty to one's Tribe! How ironic. While I wouldn't necessarily oppose its designation as "vaginal", but you've just called every single culture on the planet feminine by virtue of adhering to one's own self-affirming dogma (be it Chechnya or Juche Korea. I do concede that some men will bear the curse of immunity towards propaganda, whereas women are dissolved vessels, but such men are a miniscule minority of autistic seers, and aren't exactly human anyway (hello, Chechar from westsdarkesthour.com, yes, I'm plugging him everywhere).

Now, onto the article! First of all, the Greater Israel map was drawn by a clueless sensationalist American and carries little value - all it depicts is... the fucking Fertile Crecent? What's the fucking point? And why draw the retarded Syrian desert in-between? And if you don't include either the Nile Delta NOR the actual Mesopotamia, the only habitable zone is actually... a line from Eilat to Iskenderun? The Levant? What a great revelation (xd)! Israel wants to control its immediate neighbourhood - just as any other country in the world, oh the horror...

Second, I've been watching Nick "catboy cummies" Fuentes, and he's literally not even hiding the fact that both Egypt and Jordan have made peace with Israel, and... have lived happily ever after since? Then, what's the actual danger that Israel poses? Why is Iran opposed to Israel if it can just make peace the way others have done? Are the Jews correct that anti-Semitism is retarded and fanatical? Me as an anti-Semite, I feel like a comic book villain, because the real Gaza genocide would be if the Jews built them a Singapore on the Mediterranean - because female education and general affluence would destroy their birthrate.

Oh yes, I'm denying the "Gaza genocide". It's an utter joke. A 100k dead Arabs after 1.5 years? The Jews could have starved them by besieging Gaza, and 2 mil. would have died after 3 months (or however much time they have food for). Instead, the Jews wasted an inordinate amount of money to make the place unpleasant to live, but without killing the actual Arab vermin. No, 5% dead is not a lot. In this vein, my hypothesis has a better predictive value because I consider the Jews to be mortally afflicted with the Christian residue - what was thinkable back in the pagan-tinged times of 1947 (Nakba) is impossible in the current year.

Re: End Times - I do hope China is Judenfrei and doesn't give a single shit about Western Eurasia. Can't say the same about India - I've talked to a girl from Kerala, and she hated Muslims with the same retarded ire as my mom is finding Russians under her bed (I'm not exaggerating, Jewish cum ingestion apparently causes phantom Russian cocks, it's a miracle of meme engineering).

You will say China is controlled by the CIA - so far they haven't committed any major blunders, however. You're opposing statehood, but strong sovereign states aren't exactly an issue for pagan values, so that's irrelevant (to me). And if war comes to the Mongoloid race, I will greet it as war is always a great exam, and Confucians ace them (as I used to xd).

P.S. What would China do if Japan randomly launched missiles at them? Are traditional concepts of war even relevant when the belligerents don't have a land border OR even sea access? Also, Iran cannot lose this war - yes, even with an American invasion, the Iranian people would only win out - partly under the Turkish rule, partly under (Shia? converted Sunni?) ISIS (or the gen alpha equivalent).

Coming back to the Greater Israel concept, while it would be a curious idea to have a Jewish state that would survive the death of its servile Shoggoth race in once-Aryan Christendom, I fail to see how it would work with Egypt intact (I don't mean male/female genitals tho lmao, they cut everything off). Egypt is the main racial adversary of Judaea, not the far-away Iran. Aegyptus delenda est!

2. My comment on anti-natalism.
© Adûnâi (2025-06-15)
https://benthams.substack.com/p/a-comprehensive-takedown-of-anti/comment/126226934

Discovered your blog thanks to the post on r/natalism (where I was immediately banned for saying the current drop in fertility is related to how children are no longer needed as little slaves on the farm, go figure).

1. Curiously enough, to me as a Darwinianly-minded person, the "happy Martian" passage screams naïve idealism - because to any sensible tribal person, any more nations and humans are a direct threat to your own personal lineage and kinsfolk. See, this is where philosophy rears its ugly head - the West deals in absolute moral values, whereas the non-Christian world is simply "what is good for me is bad for others and vice versa". A classical example - a poisoner is not drinking his own poison.

2. My personal view is that life is just full of defecating, sweating, tiredness... All things that even a healthy body must complete in its path to the grave. What to say of the maiming, bodily mutilation, prison, doctors, war, rape, and just the unpleasant people and mental conditions? Or earning a living?

3. That said, I do recognise that most people are not committing suicide (for whatever mysterious reason, even those in pain rarely do it, too rarely for my comprehension). This is a clue if anything - anti-natalism is only a thing for sufficiently cognisant individuals, indeed a [morally] superior breed. Yes, I will say that because I don't care about cringe. Although do mind that I do not consider morality to be worth anything at all - the only reality is that of natural selection. So much so that I consider the modern Christian morality of giving women the right to attain education a mistake that will be corrected in the long run - although not by the current population, haha.

4. This entire question reeks to me of useless and Christian philosophy... Face it, children are slaves, and parents are slaves, too. Women are slaves to men, and men are slaves to the king (or its substitute). And the king is a slave to (concubine) ALLAH (or substitute). The naked truth is that children are begotten because men are horny, that's literally it. And nobody asked consent either of the women, or the unborn children (or indeed the men who never chose to be horny in the first place). So this feels like pointless rationalisation of horniness. Which serves an evolutionary, materialistic, biological purpose.

Why am I talking about this? Because talking of the "quality of life" of the unborn child is an odious anachronism. Akin to accusing the homines sapientes of breaking the Geneva Convention in regards to the Neanderthals. There wasn't even the city of Geneva back then, duh. Just as how the quality of life was not the point for the eukaryotes who invented sex.

> "If you can either bring one child into existence with 100 trillion units of well-being and 50 units of suffering, or one with no units of well-being and 50 units of suffering, anti-natalism of this variety would imply that it doesn’t matter which one you choose. Nuts!"

I would rather focus not on the utilitarianism but on the non-consent aspect. To my moralitarian sense, it feels equal to rape to create an issue, and then "solve" it in a backhanded post-factum way.

Overall, I tend to take a view where I have a hard time distinguishing between living and non-living matter, and it strikes me as odd to distinguish "suffering" at all. Matter multiples and cuts off its appendages, that's probably a curiosity to Cthulhu, whereas in our man-centric reality we are crying and screaming in maddening pain and anguish. Does the objective cosmic Cthulhu think the lifeless rocks are sad because they don't have life crawling all over it? Why or why not?

> "Thus, if you’re an anti-natalist because you worry about humans causing unnecessary animal suffering, you should be especially supportive of humans having offspring."

Now this is interesting. A Mexican Hitlerian César Tort considers humans worth living only with an eye on exterminating all carnivores in the future. In a way, a simpler version would be that the human mission is to destroy all life in a grey-goo scenario.

> "most people rank their positive emotions at 71 and their negative emotions at 31."

This could be chalked up to false memories and a huge cope bias. Anti-natalists know best! (/s)

> "combined with the possibility of utterly staggering boosts to global well-being via future technology"

What about Roko's Basilisk and AI making human lives objectively intentionally permanently torturous? It's a 50/50. If anything, a sensible choice would be to suicide before the coming of ASI because the boon is just not worth it (I'm not going to because I'm crazy and want an AI waifu, I'm horny).

> "But there are also some really positive moments—getting married, being wildly in love"

Also fucking children! Because to me, begetting life unconsensually is indistinguishable from fucking kids. But again, you do you. (I'm not accusing you of pedophilia, merely illustrating my point how disgusting it all feels, at least to me, makes me wince.)

Ironically, politically I'm racist and thus consider natalism indispensable to the survival of any of my beloved countries (such as Juche Korea or Afghanistan). And yet on a personal level, the very idea of children horrifies and abhors me. I guess, life is animalistic, and I'm a dead Christian inside.

> "If you save someone’s life when they’re unconscious, you can’t ask their actual permission. But it seems you get to save their life"

Oh, finally we got to my own point here... I've addressed it already, and in this case, in fact, the idea of people keeping people alive despite their will (in perpetual suffering, imprisoned in hospitals, paralised) is absolute suifuel. Apologies for bringing suicide in here, but it feels like anti-natalists (efilists) are merely too scared to bring in suicide, which would fit nicely.

In a way, the right to suicide could destroy the deontological argument because you could indeed create people without their consent, and then give them the option to kill themselves painlessly. Another anti-natalism destruction would be if birth does not create people but merely imbibe souls from some aetheric astral realm. But that's fancy.

> "those who affirm deontological anti-natalism should probably think that it would be fine to release a gas that renders everyone infertile"

Umm, obviously? But the best case would be a painless & instant grey-goo scenario, a pro-mortalist ASI of Yudkowsky's nightmares.

In conclusion, apologies for the idiosyncratic writing style, and low IQ. I consider life a manly endeavour, the only virtue is population survival. The men of the Tribe are killing machines, the women, birthing machines. Nothing else to it. Do you like it? Sounds yucky but also ejaculatory.

3. On biodeterminism.
© WorldController (2022-07-04)
https://old.reddit.com/r/masskillers/comments/vref7g/on_august_3_2017_lara_tolosa_chaneton_15_student/iev7xhm/

Psychology major here. Just so we are on the same page, as I note here:

Broadly speaking, "biological determinism" refers to the notion that psychological traits are to some significant degree caused by genes. It is variously defined as "the belief that human behaviour is directly controlled by an individual's genes or some component of their physiology," "the idea that all human behavior is innate, determined by genes, brain size, or other biological attributes," "the idea that most human characteristics, physical and mental, are determined at conception by hereditary factors passed from parent to offspring," etc. The "genetic predisposition" hypothesis, which holds that genes influence and make psychological traits more or less likely to manifest in response to experience, is indeed biodeterminist.

What you are talking about sounds like genetic predisposition, which is in fact a biodeterminist concept. However, as I summarize below, there is no reliable scientific evidence for any biodeterminist claims:

While there are certainly plenty of studies that have linked particular psychological traits with certain genes, virtually none have been replicated; further, they've all either produced statistically non-significant findings, or else miniscule effect sizes. This failure of researchers to reliably link such traits to genes is called the missing heritability problem.

To be sure, there is no reliable scientific evidence that psychological traits have particular genetic underpinnings that are consistent across individuals. On the contrary, the available evidence shows that these traits (e.g., self-concept, emotions, color perception, motivation, sexuality) derive their concrete features from sociocultural and political-economic (environmental) factors. Biology merely serves as a general potentiating substratum for psychology and does not determine or even "influence" specific outcomes; differential psychological outcomes in a population are attributable to variations in social experience rather than genetic variation.

The same, of course, applies to psychological disorders including schizophrenia, which are rooted not in genes but oppressive environmental factors (Jacobs, 1994). I expand on this point below as part of a similar discussion:

Second, please provide evidence that schizophrenia is genetically influenced, a point I refute here in some detail in response to someone expressing similar views:

In Schizophrenia and Genetics: The End of an Illusion (Kindle Edition), Joseph observes how the non-existent family history of schizophrenia in the vast majority of patients diagnosed with the disorder impugns against the hereditarian position:

Psychiatry claims that schizophrenia is a “highly heritable disorder” even though, as reported in the 2013 Fifth Edition of the DSM (DSM-5), “most individuals who have been diagnosed with it have no family history of psychosis.” In a 2006 Swedish study based on a population-based cohort of 7,739,202 individuals of known parentage, Paul Lichtenstein and colleagues found that in families in which one member was diagnosed with schizophrenia, in more than 96% of these families there were no other similarly diagnosed family members.

Twin researcher and authoritative schizophrenia author Irving Gottesman (1930-2016) wrote in his 1991 book Schizophrenia Genesis: The Origins of Madness,

“The vast majority of schizophrenics will have neither parent who is overtly schizophrenic—some 89 percent—and will have neither parents nor siblings who are affected—some 81 percent. Furthermore, a sizable majority—about 63 percent—will have negative family histories—that is, ‘clean pedigrees’—even allowing for such first-degree relatives as children and such second-degree relatives as nieces and nephews” (italics in original).

Although Gottesman was a leading supporter of genetic theories of schizophrenia for five decades, it is difficult to imagine schizophrenia as a genetically based disorder when most people carrying the diagnosis have no family history of it.

(Kindle Locations 304-319)

Not only does this demonstrate the low likelihood of this disorder having some particular genetic basis, but it refutes your claim that being raised by someone who suffers from it entails a "higher chance of having a severe mental illness."

Regarding negative symptoms, a recently published longitudinal study has, in addition to once again demonstrating the well-recognized association between socioeconomic status (SES) and schizophrenia, established SES as being a causative factor for the development of negative VS positive symptoms. Basically, people raised in low-SES environments are not only at higher risk of developing schizophrenia, but are also more likely to suffer from negative symptoms.

This confirms, as I said, that specific psychobehavioral outcomes lack a particular genetic basis. If schizophrenia and its specific subtypes were determined or even "influenced" by genes, their prevalence would not so profoundly covary with environmental factors such as SES. Such covariation definitively establishes environment's primacy vis-à-vis schizophrenia.

Finally, the notion that psychological disorders including schizophrenia entail "very different processes" from ordinary traits is likewise unsupported by reliable science. As I discuss here:

To be sure, there is no reliable scientific evidence that these disorders have particular biomedical origins that are consistent across individuals. Even the American Psychiatric Association has conceded as much. For instance, as the leader of the DSM-5 Task Force, David Kupfer, announced in a 2013 press release:

In the future, we hope to be able to identify disorders using biological and genetic markers that provide precise diagnoses that can be delivered with complete reliability and validity. Yet this promise, which we have anticipated since the 1970s, remains disappointingly distant. We've been telling patients for several decades that we are waiting for biomarkers. We're still waiting. (bold added)

To this day, 8 years later and after a half-century overall of rigorous research, such biomarkers remain elusive to scientists. This plainly indicates a failed hypothesis, which is reflected by the fact that, due to their failures here, psychiatric researchers have long debated the utility VS validity of psychiatric diagnoses as legitimate biomedical disorders. As Kendell and Jablensky (2003) note in their American Journal of Psychiatry article "Distinguishing Between the Validity and Utility of Psychiatric Diagnoses":

The consequence of defining diagnostic validity in the way we are proposing is, of course, that most contemporary psychiatric disorders, even those such as schizophrenia that have a pedigree stretching back to the 19th century, cannot . . . be described as valid disease categories.

(bold added)

You are right that genes do not specifically encode altruism. Nor, however, do they encode violence. Instead, our biology merely provides a general capacity for the development of all sorts of behavior.

4. Castaneda-esque Russian rune magick (고이가야).

ᛉ aza - assemblage point manipulation (?*algiz)
ᛞ da - wrathful manifestation (*dagaz)
ᚠ afo - longing (*fehu)
ᛡ aga - squanderous stinginess
ᚺ oho - chaotic lie (*hagalaz)
ᛃ idzhi - libellous sabotage (*jēra-)
𐌊 uku - theft (?*kaunan/?*kenaz)
ᛒ aba - sloth-less understanding (*berkanan)
ᚴ oco - erratic idleness
ᛚ ala - unnatural gluttony (*laguz)
ᛗ omo - egregore zealotry (*mannaz)
ᚾ ini - glamorous need (*naudiz)
ᛈ upu - tyrannical talent waste (?*perþ-)
ᖿ aqua - uncontrolled craving
ᚱ oro - target recognition (*raidō)
ᛋ isi - emotional spark (*sōwilō)
ᛏ utu - unconsciuos distraction (*tīwaz)
ᚹ ava - envy (*wunjō)
ᚷ oxo - programmed egoic golem (*gebō)
ᚨ a - not-indulging intent (*ansuz)
ᛟ o - man-centric will (*ōþala-)
ᛁ i - assemblage point fixation (*īsaz)
ᚢ u - personal power (?*ūruz)

(Managed to subscribe to Boosty by forsaking my chance at sex - secret of the runes indeed!)

https://old.bitchute.com/video/s9MaedEbnlMv/

P.S. 5. Lucid dream directed flight experience!
2025-06-19 controlled, directed, intentional, lucid flight achieved!

13:44-14:44 I’m non-lucid in the staircase of a decrepit apartment with someone who says an Armenian (?) no longer lives there, going downstairs (with a long hovering step once), then at the ground level looking around, seeing a tiny 1 sq meter flower bed, then walking alongside Chechar (lol, first time, I promise), looking at some woman in a car, discussing the Aryan percentages - me putting the Ukrianian at 60-80% White, and England/France at 30-50% for comparison (knowing they were off but trying to harmonise/reconcile the picture with the stats), then randomly grew _lucid_ and went all the way bacccc

…Realising my position some point along the road where my dad used to work at a postal office, trying to get to the postal office, employing flying - for the first time in a while, and ever - as a means of intentional transportation, was focusing hard on the parked cars passing by (thinking if their backs could be turned off lest they drain my energy, which thinking is pointless indulgence in itself), eventually lost _lucidity_ (of course), started going through the runes which might help, regained _lucidity_ on the rune ᛞ da (it worked, yay!) - still was unable to turn my head left, so almost by touch dodged through the building - it wasn’t exactly correct but I didn’t care; the hall felt nostalgic, although I had no way to ascertain the correctness of the scene; I knew the staircase’s look which did not appear after I entered another room which led me to realise I would be fed randomly-generated rooms, so I tried to materialise the metal staircase in the middle of the room - to no avail… until realising that I was flying upwards without one! With my arms glowing orange, which in turn prompted me to remember my hands (how ironic); I found some other room which had really pretty red leaves or vista or ruins, and I started fingering everything in sight as had been my plan all along.

13:30-13:44 Mixed lucid dreaming: _non-lucid_ road next to my hometown’s brewery with ludicrously small dogs (I’m never afraid, but I thankfully jumped upon a nifty concrete elevation); then turned left to the mall surrounded by apartments and trees, started hearing Mozart’s Lacrimosa (lmao, thankfully not Beethoven), which prompted me _lucidly_ to anticipate the notes - which in turn led to the loss of the visual component and in fact a mildly protracted sleep paralysis - which I tried to use as an aid either to restore the dream or enter an out-of-body experience for the first time ever, to no avail.

12:30-13:30 Sleep.

05:00-09:00 Sleep. Disparate non-lucid dreams about an ugly school corridor on the 3d floor - it was really ugly, with smears on the floor akin to a barn, me curiously peeking into one of the doors without stopping, reaching the end, noticing a classroom, remarking how it must suck to have a classroom there, going downstairs, finding the English classroom finally, asking if it’s my subgroup, and the 3 people there responding negatively, me sighing and going away (ghost experience lmao).

(This was prefaced by another class which ended with me picking up a notebook about a nuclear war, and 2 plastic bags with something, thinking if I should skip classes (planning), then going to the what would turn to be the ugly corridor, someone asking me what was in the bags and me responding “Coldplay”.)

02:45-05:00 Sleep.

2025-06-17 11:37-11:50 Sleep. Almost had an astral out of body experience! Dreaming about:
1) lying on the floor on my left side, looking at my shrine to the pseudo-dead JP girl (it being shiny in the middle, the ofuda?), I immediately have a hell yeah moment I'm in a dream!
2) I eventually lose vision, but try to stabilise with thanking the girl and calling to rune Isa;
3) try rolling to enter astral, feel great vibration but fail;
4) then swim on my back with my legs, then arms;
5) then maybe imagining behind my eyelids me being in the bed, the shrine again shimmering, me falling on the floor, trying to look at the bed (partial success in out of body experience?)

05:00-09:00 Sleep.

2025-06-16 14:44-19:00 Sleep. Dreaming about:
1) playing Artanis and standing in the boss capture circle;
2) an Odessa chad with a chin and gf getting jailed;
3) fighting over a place in a rocket, also some planet;
4) being in a Jewish magick Kabbalah class, a line with letters, also smaller lines in the 4 corners, kyfir and al moleculae, some girl (?) responding about the plural form as -ae.

…That’s about all! This was supposed to go in the original post, but the today’s dream of 06-19 has been a treat, all things considered. Apologies for the induced cringe, it’s nothing important, just the locations of 이놀 in the cult’s terminology (school/prison/hospital), although for me, only school is important, and the only place I was ever alive, hence the frequency.
https://cyclowiki.org/wiki/Тональ

What progress has been made? Attempts at an out-of-body experience (x2, failed), conscious sleep paralysis, regaining lucidity after an interruption, fingering the walls. Also need to remember that materialising things in a dream is difficult and ought to work with what I have, with the internal dream-logic.