Thanks for the blog. I've been browsing a few days. I take it back myself. I can't speak for 'Chechar' (I haven't browsed every comment on his huge blog yet) but I was guilty of thinking you a troll, as you know. I see now you're not. I take it he probably meant that as in 'responds with similar query without acknowledging previous replies that add further context'.
My favourite commenters probably would have included Walsh also, had I known him. I like Jamie too, for the enthusiasm (though I wish he'd say more), plus the erudition of Gaedhal, who I'm on the mailing list of. I hear Mauricio's pretty sound also. I like people who call a spade a spade, and those who are ok with outright revolutionary speech (of 'the brigade' type etc. by analogy). I know who I don't like at least - not for their content, but for their lack of imagination/lack of radicalism. Is 'Chechar' 'sarky/toxic'? I see him more as just a very overworked person, perhaps flustered even (understandably - he's as sensitive as me), with the patience level natural to an old man. I've got annoyed at him a few times, to quite a pronounced degree. On re-evaluation it's always been my own fault - like me throwing a temper tantrum. He's kind of cryptic over that. I put it down to politeness. I got to the site a few years too late I think.
I might be barking up the wrong tree on this post, and I know you can't have known, but as I far as I can see from the UK, Russia's tentatively winning (well, it looks it). I was one of the ones hoping for a contained nuclear strike on Kiev. Nothing personal - I mean, I don't see individuals, as much as the 'cause'. I don't think anything the measly UK can splat out can really affect that too much, apart from raising the nuclear threat again (preferably I'd like London to go too).
I typed a late-as-ever second response to you on my own blog btw. Just going over old ground, plus a new speculation. I was curious, I suppose. Back to aetiologies.
Anyhow, I'll have a further browse round here another day this week and see if I can find something to add more directly related.
Wow, thanks, Benjamin, it's an undeserved honour to "meet" you here! I do think that I can't really be part of any category fully, and for good reasons. What's to say of my anti-natalist (pro-mortalist?) tendencies in the context of racism? Hell, what few folks I have talked to online since 2024, they have mostly been women - which is a mortal sin in C.T.'s perspective, too...
I must have specified it in the current blog entry, but I could recount it here, as well. My main issues with Chechar have been these so far:
1) he values the Aryan race purely as an aide to his idealistic morality - because it has proclivity to gentleness towards children and animals; this means his racism is contingent on certain arbitrary qualities of the race, and the race is only good as long as it adheres to his own vision what it should be;
(I myself would not be so arrogant and would rather focus on the objective issues such as worshipping a foreign god and breeding foreign nations)
2) in practice, it went with my questions: "What if Aryans are dying out due to hurting their kids less?" "What if cruelty to animals is the backbone of the triumphant Mongoloid race?" "Why breed Aryans to make the best suffer when the chances of a global victory over carnivorous animals are slim to none?"
(Add to that his unironic hatred of orca whales who are some of the most intelligent animals on the planet! Only because they supposedly "torture" seals! Although yes, I'm a sucker for intelligence myself, I even fed crows nuts at one point.)
3) and in more recent years, C.T. has gone off the rails listening to the likes of Tucker Carlson, Douglas Macgregor and Scott Ritter, who are obviously protected régime-grifters and should be treated no better than any randomly taken nigger.
> "Russia's tentatively winning (well, it looks it). I was one of the ones hoping for a contained nuclear strike on Kiev"
Now what is the issue here? The larger picture is that the Judaeo-Christian empire seems unable to kill its enemies properly - they cannot even exterminate the savages in Gaza. Still, they have been fairly successful in weakening the Russian military to a breaking point - with a possible invasion in sight ca. 2027-30? Again, not too sure if it would hurt the Russian race as the Putin régime is killing them with immigration and Christian feminist values much better than any war ever could - so by supporting a possible survival of the Aryan folk in Russia, I should also support a NATO invasion? Just how a US invasion of Iran would probably improve the people there? Case in point - Iraq and now Syria.
As to the hypothetical scenario of what the Kremlin could have easily done to impose its will, there are many pathways, none of which predispose killing a million of your best troops in a self-cucked tiny frontline in Donbass without destroying the Dnieper bridges, namely:
1) a bloodless police operation in 2014 which would have annexed the entirety of the Ukraine without a shot fired (maybe stopping at Ternopol due to the Austrian border);
2) a nuclear holocaust of all right-bank Ukrainian cities - which, granted, would be cruel, but it would also make the whole world respect Russia, show its resolve, improve the nuclear deterrent, and barely make a dent in the nuclear arsenal (which, incidentally, should have long since been expanded).
None of these options have been taken, and Russia is losing, no matter what the Jewish press might tell you. And no, the Ukraine's own position is irrelevant, because there are Poland, Romania, Germany, England and France, with an overwhelming air force and nuclear triad, ready to go just as eagerly as chemically castrating their kids.
In an alternate world, I would love to see Russia lose on racial grounds. But this world has grown so schizophrenic that I would love Russia lose because it would improve the position of the Russian people in their own country... And not because of liberal values...
All in all, I've been tired by this idiocratic nonsense. The best Russians such as Sofa Legion Strategist and Strelkov are calling Americans bloodthirsty when they are nothing but... The Jews are growing China, their peer competitor... The supposed right-wing backlash is led by lesbian Iranian women...
Me? I just want a peace deal to be fucked by escorts in Latvia, it's too retarded for me at this point.
Good day. I hope you're well. Thank you very much for your response. I read it all, and though, well I can't respond to everything - apologies for that. As I've wrote elsewhere recently, I'm doped to the gills on neuroleptics and they have a profound negative cognitive effect; it neuters the fine points of critical thinking. Besides, I'm not knowledgeable enough on politics in the Ukraine. Thank you for correcting me for your perspective.
I'll keep it brief today. As for the whole antinatalist perspective, I tend to refer to the idea, as I think has been covered on WDH that it's more of a stalling than a solution - life might evolve elsewhere; plus I'm not sure virus bombing the entire earth would succeed - life is tenacious. I'm an idealist in that also. I feel 'Tortian' exterminationism solves the problem, theoretically, as a tester to see if it can be solved elsewhere in future. Not of suffering, but of needless suffering, taken for a reviewed personal perspective in tandem with others. Yes, it is arrogant. I'm not sure how else to establish objectivity. One can argue arrogance also a classic trait of the racial intact Aryan, historically. 'Nothing can be done' does not sit well with my attitude of action.
Is is arbitrary or is there a modicum of free-will involved? As with discipline, kindness/compassion is honed. I'm not a genetic determinist - all the usual researchers on that sway me, but specifically I've currently re-reading Patrick D. Hahn. I haven't decided how arbitrary it is to pick Aryans (either). It's too instinctive to me. It was back to what I was saying on my antipsychiatry blog. It's something felt, or it isn't, like with art or Veganism or whatever (which, by the by, I'd say requires extreme discipline - it makes my weightlifting much harder, I am informed). It probably feels like a terrible cop out to explain it to someone who doesn't feel it, regardless of rationality, and perhaps cannot be achieved in words (which is my intuition).
I like intelligence in animals, and working it out, and spotting it (I only delved into encephalization quotients recently) but, as with humans (Aryans - take it as read when I write 'human' I mean the latter), there are other qualities in them I enjoy and am to some degree sustained by. I keep rabbits for example, and a hamster (plus a working dog and some small birds, though the latter are my girlfriend's and I hate them being caged up inside; she's not Vegan/animal ethicist). The more time I spend around them, the more meaningful the interactions become, and I extend that. Emotive warmth is one factor, manifesting as compassion in humans, albeit somewhat dilute by comparison. Resilience and willpower. Focus. Dedication. Love, even. Patience. Certainly pure hate (for those worth being only enemies). Intelligence alone sometimes feels hollow. Or intelligence and some other qualities (but not enough).
I watched the orca clips over and over again personally to decide on it. I baulked at it at first, thinking, 'hey, what's he on about?!' but the more I examined the blue whale calves and their reactions, the more more empathy came into play. Personally, I related it back to experiences I was more familiar with (unfortunately). Could carnivores be separated from prey without undue suffering, I wondered? Or, alternatively, are there evolutionary pathways that they may yet develop into and which we, by are myriad presence on this planet, are in the way of? I notice their survival of the fittest isn't good enough at the moment in that can't adapt fast enough to us (and this time I'll include the many billions of morons in that 'we'), and thus seem to have reached a stagnant evolutionary plateau. I say this as my dog, Skyler (a large Australian Shephard/Lurcher) doesn't really seem to go for meat with much enthusiasm, and indeed lives almost purely on fruits and vegetables. It's not something I've conditioned in him, although I noted it early on and try to match his wishes. A eugenics for animals so to speak, to stimulate (or cultivate) their omnivorous tendencies. I get the idea Cesar was against the orca not for the act of consuming the baby whale alive, which is the norm, excluding domestic pets, but for the sadistic element, as with his honey badgers and hyenas point. it seemed a great waste also just to go for the tongue.
By the way, I should be more used to blunt conversation. My girlfriend's diagnosed with autism (at least tentatively). I constantly 'weather' mental health/Veganism opinions; trying to explain the concept of human 'egg theft' from chickens the other day was tough - I said, look, you recognise it if squirrels or oviraptors do it, why not us? In return though, she doesn't really like me gleefully going on about the practical ins and outs of conducting escalating international genocide/planetary conquest, ha. Apart from that, I don't talk to women. One doesn't want to be sabotaged, basically (think Scarlett in Gone With the Wind). Besides, I don't get much out of them.
Oops... I must go. Talk to you later. I need to water my crops.
It's a pleasure talking to you, although I do hope C.T. comes back as he seems more fit to be in your company^^ The political situation is utterly insane, and especially in the Anglo part of cyberspace, stifling. Russians at least have their LiveJournal... Blogs I could recommend would be Rolo Slavskiy and Mikhailov, maybe Miguel-Kud.
I always wondered, how can you as a functioning adult be subjected to involuntary drugging? I don't really understand it. Although that you have sex makes me envy you even more - of course, it might be due to your age and sociability, but being touched by a woman is something I might never experience, and that's what's gnawing at my soul the most. Sure, it could be a fake mirage, but I will never know without trying, and as history shows, only female company can give me any inspiration whatsoever.
There is a Chinese girl who was travelling around Europe buying sheep and pigs to save them from slaughter - I wish Chechar saw that, haha... Although the girl in question is arguably feeble-minded, so can't be representative.
Psychohistory, a directed evolution of gentleness seems to me just one of the possible pathways? After all, Chechar himself considers the Aryan race in its deathbed - and if it does go extinct, along with its kindness, who are we to call Nature mistaken? (Unless "we" are the "god's" awakening self-consciousness.) But viewing anything in theistic or humanistic terms is weird to me. Why not view the Universe as a giant meat grinder of suffering? Why should pain even considered inconducive to the whole business?
See, I would naturally be much more dispassionate, observable, descriptive as opposed to prescriptive. Just as how in high school I was disgusted by the sexual stuff, BUT still considered it part of the natural inclinations of man - and thus would tolerate it as inevitable. But you as an Aryan would be familiar with the chemical castration that your idealism brings your kind so easily to^^ Prescriptionism is dangerous and artificial.
Vegetarianism that makes you weaker - isn't it ultimately an idealistic hurdle that decreases everyone's power and beauty? Sure, you could try to make it a rule worldwide, but would fist have to conquer the planet. And so far, the cat-boiling Chinese are the champions in this regard? If Strateg is to be believed, they have just now mastered the TSMC-style UV lithography. Go, chinks, go!
Re: intelligence, I would view it as indeed my supreme quality of preference. Nothing else really matters. Self-awareness is the quotient of soul. No reflection means the being in question is a machine-like golem. So what if my mom is kind if she cannot decide otherwise? If she's hopelessly programmed never to consider the alternative? I have many times offered her my suicide for her to emigrate to her beloved archipelago off the coast of Africa, yet she refuses. Even though I'm already an idle corpse.
Again, prescriptivism. You see Nature and you want to change it. How are you different from the Christians then? It's the Jews who want to remove all suffering and give us virtual reality with anime waifus. Maybe even induce a grey goo scenario, satisfying Chechar accidentally, who knows? Conversely, when I look at Nature, I understand that to survive, one must imitate it. And if you don't want to, then you can kill yourself - what the Jews are doing, with their schizo kindness to their own enemies such as Arabs and Chinese.
Apropos cruel females - see this Mongoloid beauty torturing a squid on YouTube.
A very good reply. I'm afraid this one will be even briefer in terms of direct responses. Thanks for the links - I'll delve into those. I don't spend as much time browsing the internet as I probably should. It's a bit of an eye-opener for me.
Basic note on prescriptivism and on changing Nature. I think I'd go with the 'well, we evolved with this cerebral ability to be idealistic'/'maybe teleologically-speaking Nature actively requires changing internally' argument, and it's just the time historically for that to occur, or at least, can be by the consciousness-driven decision of an evolved lifeform. The fact that an organism in Nature, and of Nature can enact change in Nature is thus rendered natural, being of Nature. It's a tough one, as, as you imply (I think), that argument validates any altering perspective, including degenerates. I suppose I'd have to be empirical and weight up how the herbivores would feel about it, and indeed the carnivores. Do they like suffering? Is it a lesser evil? If some mad freaky thing evolved that could stop that, would Nature's law be defiled? That's just me musing by the way. I still mull over teleology - from a natural perspective, mind - much as I toy with a non-Christian (etc.) cosmo-deism and a radical panentheism (which may mean the same fundamentally). Regardless, we're here for the moment. Whether something is moral or good or bad or whatever, it can be done and it may yet be done. I'll take it experimentally. I don't see this in many people at all; hence I hope from my perspective that those who don't manifest it can be pruned. They'd do best to wish the same of me. Like Hitler, I wouldn't push Veganism until victory, or at least partial victory (not necessarily planetary). Neanderthal extermination; speculative animals work; interstellar. I think it has to be in that order. Quite rich for one bloke sat in a room in Essex, I hear you say, ha!
Yeah, I flitter back and forth on it very occasionally, but never really put much thought to going extinct. That can be for then; otherwise it feels defeatist. I suppose that's hope. It solidifies as certainty. The will to win. The knowledge that we will. The desire to drive one's bountiful enemies into annihilation. The knee-jerk unconscious assumption on that. More than national warfare, I'm just dwindling away waiting for a currency/energy collapse (I know, I'm not very inventive!). I have no faith in the US, but a little in Europe/the UK (perhaps the UK more than continental Europe). I read your US civil war and Russian annihilation piece; I liked it.
I say 'dwindling'; I'm getting stronger physically monthly (or was up until last Summer, though I still work out despite it) and more honed mentally, an internal jihad, but it is rather boring. Maybe I am weaker not being a meatie anymore; I don't feel it. There's a sort of cleansing sensation I get now I didn't have before also. Cognitively it hasn't made any difference. I've got a tribunal tomorrow with a lawyer hired to fight for getting me off the drugs. When that inevitably fails, I have a few more organizations to try and utilize. Short of going lone wolf i.e. postal, which I feel wouldn't have been very effective beyond temporary satisfaction, I realised I had to submit. If not me, ultimately, others can fight this battle until I recover the means to extricate myself from State clutches. Regardless, what am I worth? That has yet to be seen, if at all. Even then, regardless, what? I wonder often how many others there are like me in the UK, busier perhaps, more subtle.
I wouldn't say my girlfriend tortures me as such (beyond what I can assume is the usual - I haven't dated heavily), but sex isn't really a priority. Despite my moaning on my own site, it was me who initially withdrew, so to speak, from the idea. I think I like her more as a mother to my stepson, and a home-maker. It's not a bitterness thing, I just grew out of it. There are better, more fulfilling things to do. I'm 39 by the way. Also, I'm not too social myself. I (on rare occasions) hang around with an infuriating bourgeois conservative type, and a young ex-Marxist, and can't really claim much more than that, bar the old pisshead ex-soldier round the corner I go and chat sh*t with now and again, or trade to. Aside from that, all my friends are dead. I don't wish for more real-life contact (bar what would be pragmatic in future times).
Out of interest, when you're inspired by hypothetical female company, what do you feel could then be achieved?
Incidentally, yeah, I hope Cesar comes back. it had crossed my mind briefly that perhaps it was a suicide ploy and he's made a convenient narrative to exit, in the works for quite a while, but I put that down to my own worries. He seemed in between the lines a littler lower/more doubtful recently, but again, that could very much be me projecting. I worry for him but he doesn't seem the type. I imagine his former life has imparted enough of a will to live.
Anyway, I really will leave you the day now. I tried watching the squid vid but I found the woman unattractive (I cannot find enemies pleasurable) and a bit sort of... immature maybe? I mean in terms of the tittering and exaggerated facial expressions. I go for people slightly older. I'm sterile too naturally, so I suppose one can be quite thankful I don't pass these genetics on, much as I don't believe heritability is all it's cracked up to be. Seriously though, I'm from a Norman family. I'm not sure I'd even count as Aryan by the most stringent classifiers. I'd glad the choice to be the last has been made for me, thus saving me a little willpower.
1. Teleology - sure, it's not inherently unnatural, and deriving any conclusions is difficult as we don't know the future success of the present practices. I could be tempted to say that such behaviours as chemical castration of children, OR children rights are retarded because they are born of complete lunacy, with zero regard to any survival. But I won't. All I will say is that the Aryan race is sick in the head, and its track record demonstrates as much, as opposed to the Mongoloid race:
1) Germany? Lost like a rabid dog;
2) Russia? Lost twice in a century, now losing a third time;
3) America? Chemically castrates its children and refuses to kill its enemies, instead imports them.
Conversely, in the Mongoloid race:
1) China expunged all Abrahamics in Korea and Vietnam;
2) Korea is independent;
3) only Japan is a failure, but it was still fun while it lasted, and they had no chance anyway.
Ergo, everything coming from an Aryan mind is sick and useless to consider. It's a canine kind that will perish like dogs.
...Apologies for this harsh tone, I guess, I can't take seriously anything coming from Europe, especially not from the Anglosphere. To me, if a person speaks English, he's inherently homosexual. Russian isn't much better either at this point, they will constantly use Marxist memes (just now I've seen "we were moving for thousands of years towards ending slavery" - even though abolitionism is a sick English fetish like the chemical castration of children, or feminism).
I may be somewhat "orientalist" in my sensibilities, as I don't even speak Asian languages. But I'm vaguely aware that ISIS existed, that the Taliban have banned women from schools, that Juche Korea has been worshipping its divine line of Mangyongdae for 80 years now... And Japan poses an example of an actually traditional society, too, albeit occupied.
Just as how you cannot go reading English without vomiting, you can't go reading about Japan without a smile.
It's surprising you're under 40, my impression was you were over 60. That's how it usually goes, just useless old boomers - and in Slavic lands, retarded Jewish golems.
Nothing realistic can be achieved in my life. I feel like I'm but a tourist here, renting my phimosis body from Allah. Under proper circumstances, I could have been a great diligent zealous Party official, even under Communism, would have been sent to Kalmykia to miscegenate. But in capitalism, I'm not interested in anything. Female company is merely a thing that I'd love to experience, but not sure if it would postpone my suicide.
There are a few points against my suicide - nuclear war, AGI singularity. But it's 2025 already, and neither has occurred. Your energy devolution thing seems pointless, too - wasn't it prophecised a long while ago? The dollar collapse was all the rage after the 2008 economic disaster, and that's 17 years ago. Sure, Chris Martenson was pointing to graphs on 2026, iirc, so maybe?
Chechar is too stupid / non-White to be suicidal, haha. Although chances are, he might be mutilated by the cartels. I wonder why he never mentions cartels, when they're all the rage on WatchPeopleDie. Always wanted to ask him how he may consider Latin America "blue-pilled" when its youth mutilate each other limb from limb. Seems rather glorious and masculine?
P.S. Why the hell would you ever take drugs? What are Anglo people like this? Isn't there any sentiment that poisoning your mind is bad? No wonder you chemically castrate children, what a disgusting kind...
That's ok, respond in your own time, naturally. I'm not going anywhere (well, bar jailing perhaps). Oh, just to clear up, no, I don't take drugs. I was referring to psych drugs (not that they're exactly chemically distinct). The only reason I acquiesce to those is because I was coerced into signing a community treatment order. If I don't, they haul me in under Police escort, pin me to the bed in restraints and stick them in anyway. So I signed it, as a stopgap whilst I work out how, whenever possible, to get them off my back. I'm imagining I might just have to come to terms with 2 subsequent years of hell and a lot of weary jumping through hoops. I'll get my revenge for that, served cold.
Maybe it's simple: the Aryan race is sick because it expends nigh on 100% of its warfare energy turning on itself. That's the story from year dot. Christianity's made that worse. If it could be made not to do that, I think there'd be a reckoning. A ramification is that it sets up enemies in cushy positions for their futures, not that we don't seem to do that separately also. I know we can at least war and kill, as we've done it to ourselves enough, with a suitable brutality at times. I'm not one just to hope/wait for Christianity to die out, given that neochristianity isn't going anywhere, and the two sustain each other (at least on the right). One hopes only for the short sharp shock. British people are inherent cowards, but I still think it reasonable that, for whatever muted reason or will, intolerable conditions will have a mechanical effect on stimulating their pushback spirit. I see most of them as totally expendable (just a big, quite angry, lump) but there's always a chance for a few to progress. They may not be effective, but if there's a temporary acknowledgement that they hate the government and its helpful community voters more than each other, then you've got a little potential. I don't think it's wise not to step in at that point though, lest they just go back to insular Hobbit bickering. Quite a lot are tougher than me, but they're simply not angry enough.
We have not yet reached universally intolerable conditions. There's no consensus. Anyone who thinks we have now is woefully pampered. I don't think they're too far off though (I'd imagine waves of dissent, brief lulls and troughs, and failed approaches, and always more embittered, and then just that gathering 'wham'). I don't usually think further afield than two decades, where I can be certain something will already have occurred. I'm sure, at that level, choice tends to disappear, and it's just actions, one being compelled by survival, whether they quite pay heed to it or not. Also, regardless of when it happens, the fiat money system is - theoretically at least, from its very structuring - bound to fail. I go with the Chris Martenson types too... Ray Dalio, MacLeod, etc. They get the dates wrong all the time, which infuriates me, but at vaguest conception, I think the idea itself is sound. Despite his drab, pretentious prose, it's Sebastian Ernst Ronin I'd accept over post peak-oil (prudently setting it at conservative estimate) not the mainstream theorists. Steve Goreham's book was an eye-opener on the nitty gritty of green energy also. Monitoring the sort of Zerohedge-tier normie comment sections with UK posters suggests in the wake of the David Betz speculations that UK citizens are at least getting bolder at being openly pissed off. There's a subtle change from before, say, how it was last year. A sudden genuine focus to the platitudes, as opposed to your average keyboard warrior. I'd say they're in general about 60% less hateful/rage-filled than this apocryphal revolutionary exterminationist type, and a good few years behind, but it's a start. The 10-15% group is at least simmering overtly, and realistically starting to boil in the background. Potential-wise, it's actually the 2% that frustrate/disappoint me more. I notice my private desires over actual responses and techniques of war are not as tame or polite as the majority - ok, everyone - I read on WDH, much as I don't share them, and won't be. If I had my way...
As I said before, my mind simply doesn't allow me to consider total defeat, but I think I'd appreciate discrete last stands, at that distant point, taken as something I can't really grasp. Desperation could help. Something memorable a least; a cautionary tale for whatever other Aryan groups take up the baton. I wish, just for empathy's sake that I could envisage defeat altogether for a few moments. I'm sorry though, I just can't. Not for a lack of imagination, but for an overabundance of optimism.
Yes, English is lazy of me. My Russian isn't good enough though. I'm still only a beginner at it (and very much not at a level to put that across). Another reason I thank you for some of the recent blog shares. I still read by sounding phonetically. If the trial goes well I'll return to it. I think German would be useful to me also, simply for some of the books I'd like to read. It both amuses and inspires me as a practical masculine language though. If the Whispering Leaves books take too long, I'll stick Spanish on that list, provided I have the time for it. Nothing non-European (as there's nothing I want to say to them). A young relative's got Romanian on the go. That or Serbian would be a future idealism. But I start small. I was fairly competent in Latin at one point, but that's gone now.
Yes, I find the chemical castration thing grotesque, totally. I blame the government medical complex (any other way to put the NHS?) bleeding heart types and the parents more than the nuts transsexual activists, who seem to just do what one would expect of them somehow, but I can't say I'm a fan of any of it. And that doesn't mean they get an excuse. Directly, none of my stepchildren are involved though, thankfully, and are not at an age/environment where that's a concern. It's not a topic I've ever had the mental energy to research too much. Too distasteful and enervating, but with worse I can spot at the same time, and then get carried away by instead. I suppose, probabilistically, do we want that many people having more children at the moment? it's not like it's making a huge long-term difference, and with the dark closing it, the historical conditions wouldn't be suitable for them. Taking my two decades cut-off pronouncement into account, I'm afraid we've basically got all we're going to get in terms of bodies to work with. I don't know enough about younger Zoomers to know whether there'll be too weak, anxious, conflict-avoidant and demoralised to instil warrior values, given their own halfway soppy parents.
I haven't got a problem with slaves per se, but I do wonder as to the quality of their work. Also, part of me would prefer we took the hard route and did it much more slowly, but by ourselves, though a home-grown approach to innovation. A bit more brainpower, but a more robust technological paradigm - AI wastes my time. I suppose, at consumer level (which is all I can see of it) it's designed to. This is a problem of mine with animal husbandry also. By all means take (biped) slaves for one generation or if you temporarily need them under inopportune conditions, but them just kill them all afterwards. Breeding them feels lazy, and sets them up for intergenerational bitterness and infinitesimal revolt, as well as providing a 'handy' public spectacle which there's always the chance a more sentimental element of your own group might take a shine to, hopeful abolitionists, or whatnot.
Sorry, I must go for the morning. Errands and minutiae. Thanks for the link. I'll read it later.
Cheers,
BP
PS. I respond quite quickly usually. Don't feel under any pressure to. I talk too much online at times, once someone gets me going, and it gives me time to mull over my own thoughts also. What I don't want is to be constructing an obligation 'text adventure'.
...They have been distorting and misrepresenting my views yet again. I wonder whether he has the integrity to let my response pass through, but anyway, this is just precious. Who in his right mind believes Putinian Russia to be able to win? And who would ever call the Ukraine "my country"? This isn't blind spots anymore, this is delirium. Which is fine, I'm not expecting much to begin with.
Take Elon's admission that his son got turned into a cute trap - like what side would that even hold currency with? The Western world has gone utterly retarded, big and small, all mad.
It continues to confuse me how Adunai and those like him (often called “Nazbols”) can admire Bolsheviks. Even purported National Socialists who defend Christianity are easier to understand, as they may have a superficial understanding of one ideology or both. But even the most superficial understandings of National Socialism or Bolshevism will show that they are fundamentally opposed to one another. What baffles me more is how aware Adunai is of Neo-Christianity, even though opposing Neo-Christianity while admiring Stalin is as nonsensical as opposing Christianity while admiring John Paul II.
Good point. Over time I realised that Adunai wasn’t honest or consistent. For example, when various YouTube channels started saying that the official narrative of the war in Ukraine was bullshit, Adunai continued to believe that his country was going to beat the Russians, and didn’t understand why the Ukrainian army didn’t launch an offensive.
...Considering that Chechar has decidedly not allowed my comment to pass, I will respond directly and tremendously - uselessly into the aether. No holds barred. Adult to adult, no kiddie gloves. Just put on some Chikoi the Maid, letting my mind drift to the memory of the dead Jap girl, and let us go.
> "how Adunai and those like him (often called “Nazbols”) can admire Bolsheviks."
Ideology is of little import to me. Incidentally, that is how I can pay moral respect to both ISIS and Juche - I have sufficient humility to understand that I do not know much about culture's efficacy aside from the fact that worshipping a dead Jewish angel of mercy is clearly and demonstrably collectively suicidal.
Hence calling me "Nazbol" is rather pointless. Why not "White Sharia"? Or Aryan Juche?
Let alone tying Stalin to this of all people? I literally never mentioned Stalin in any of my points in my life - aside from maybe admitting that female labour and immediate ruthless mobilisation saved Russia from certain annihilation.
But of course. this retard (Chechar, Nik seems only to draw from him like Mathew from Mark) is referring to my point contra Hellstorm Holocaust. Which has nothing to do with Stalin, and everything - with putting the crucified Germs in place of the crucified Jew. As I have legit never been abused in my childhood and view Christianity as dispassionately and distantly as Mongolian Lamaism, I don't have a yearning need for moaning about the dead.
Do not get me wrong, I respect the (worthy) dead viciously and loyally, yet I would rather focus on their glorious last stand and even scathing critiques of their failures than bitching about the sore wounds. In a word, Goodrich is saying, "The enemies of the Aryans are killing the Aryans". Fucking duh. Brain-damaged. Cannot build a culture around such an idiotic, obvious take.
> "But even the most superficial understandings of National Socialism or Bolshevism will show that they are fundamentally opposed to one another. What baffles me more is how aware Adunai is of Neo-Christianity"
Bolshevism is not neo-Christianity. Or at least it was an archaic neo-Christianity, to be more precise. Because right now, neo-Christianity has taken a form of insane, libertarian, woke anarchism. Whereas Bolshevism was an anti-racist, family-oriented Eurasian cult of the machine. Bolshevism has nothing to do with the modern American Protestant values of cuntboy rights. Hence putting it in the same category, while technically correct, would only hopelessly confuse our poor Nik.
> "when various YouTube channels started saying that the official narrative of the war in Ukraine was bullshit, Adunai continued to believe that his country was going to beat the Russians, and didn’t understand why the Ukrainian army didn’t launch an offensive."
> "Self-deception, obviously."
This is so ridiculous, I just can't.
1. First of all, Chechar has been consuming feces excreted by such brain-rotten chaps as Douglas MacGregor and Scott Ritter. The shit-faced morons who have been parading such laughable lies that only a dark-skinned Negro would buy them - or indeed a clueless NA boomer.
2. What official narrative, Chechar? Ritter & MacGregor are part thereof. The other side of the coin! They have not been blocked by YouTube. They enjoy an immense following. They are lying through their teeth. They are the prolefeed for the mentally challenged - or at least, to fill the lacunae of the otherwise decent folks (such as our one and only Chechar - when it comes to hating non-Europeans, at least).
3. Where in the actual fuck have I ever called _the_ Ukraine "my country"? Why would I call the Jews who want physically to vanquish my kind "mine"? My slave-owners? The reason why I will never commit hand-holding with a waifu, and can't even go outside anymore?
4. Where in the actual fuck did I ever call this a war between the Ukraine and Russia? My poëtic post of July 2022 presented it as America consuming the dead Russia's carcass with minimal resistance.
Now I might modify my views a tad - Sofa Legion Strategist (Strategos or Strategushka as I endearingly call him in my soliloquies) has been proven incorrect in his anticipation of a swift disarming nuclear strike against Russia, and so the Kremlin might continue being but another "pillar of Zion" as I christened it once. Whereas the ill-begotten Little Russian pseudonation is merely speedrunning collective suicide, catching up with the West, as Khrushchev bequeathed.
5. "didn’t understand why the Ukrainian army didn’t launch an offensive" - What is he even blabbering about? The Ukrainian army did launch two immensely successful offensives - at Kharkov and Kherson, in September and November 2022 respectively. The final times the frontline has moved at all. The summer 2023 offensives? They were pathetic failures. Just as the Russian pseudo-offensives at Lisichansk, Bakhmut and Avdeevka which nobody in his right mind would call successes or relevant to Russia's victory.
6. And now we're coming to the larger picture. I have been watching such clear-headed and knowledgeable (for idiotic Christians, beggars can't be choosers) Russians as Igor Strelkov (monarchist), Maxim Kalashnikov (Stalinist), Sofa Legion Strategist (bloodthirsty Day-of-the-Rope-style anarchist), Sergey Kurginyan (witch-hunting cult leader), and they have all been ringing the bells in panic regarding both the anarchic ineptitude and malicious sabotage of the Russian war effort's conduct by the latently pro-American flunkeys of capitalism and liberalism.
> "A couple of times he said that it might be a good idea for parents to burn their children alive in the context of ritual human sacrifice (cf. my book Day of Wrath)."
Yes, I did suggest that. In a spirit of free debate. I am humble enough to know what I do not know. And I do not know whether child sacrifice is not conducive to a nation's survival. What if it were? Checharian ideology would support collective suicide if it were proved to be so! And what's the point? See, that is why I cannot take Chechar seriously - why trade the same nihilistic self-destruction for another? I came to view racism as the only response to high-IQ nihilism (no, Christianity is not nihilistic, I disagree with Nietzsche in that nihilism effects any mass-men at all). And yet, here we're back at square one, spinning useless idealistic cobwebs aside from the simple motto of "fuck & kill" (in a collectivist fashion, Andrew-Tate-style anarchism is hysterical).
> "The answer is simple: if I am an exterminationist it is precisely because humans are cruel to animals (and many to their own children, as is clear from my trilogy in Spanish)."
Birthing those children, dooming them to this pitiful and uncomfortable incarnated existence is already an indefensible crime. And animals are nothing but stupid, vile machine bred to maim and destined to die in horrific torture - so what difference does it make who the torturer is? Blame the demiurge.
> "By the way, Adunai still lives in Ukraine. He is lucky he hasn’t been conscripted to fight against the Russians"
The Jew-obeying cucks have not been invading people's homes yet. My mom is saying they never will. So calm your tits, the system is slow and retarded. And, paraphrasing the Other Minister, unfortunately, the Aryans are even slower and incomprehesibly more retarded.
That is why I have nothing but scorn for this wretched continent, in ruins since 1945. Had three chances - and blew them all! The Mongoloid race has had a much better track record comparatively. Not that I would necessarily be thinking in terms of "the torch of civilisation". But I'm not hubristic to be a dog sitting on straw (a Little Russian saying).
Thanks! It's a reblog from Chechar's WDH. I do agree with Autisticus Spasticus in wishing for Chechar to be more reasonable and less snarky/toxic. What he's saying about the blind spots is painfully applicable to him, too. But that's apparently the way humans operate.
From the Russosphere, I could share the case when a middle-tier conspiracy theorist Miguel-Kud considered me a troll sent by some other blogger - despite my demonstrating my legit history going years back that has nothing to do with other bloggers.
Or take all the Russian influencers such as Igor Strelkov, Maxim Kalashnikov, Mikhailove, Zadumov, Zhmilevskiy or Sofa Legion Strategos who hate one another's guts, squabbling over trivialities.
Thanks for the blog. I've been browsing a few days. I take it back myself. I can't speak for 'Chechar' (I haven't browsed every comment on his huge blog yet) but I was guilty of thinking you a troll, as you know. I see now you're not. I take it he probably meant that as in 'responds with similar query without acknowledging previous replies that add further context'.
My favourite commenters probably would have included Walsh also, had I known him. I like Jamie too, for the enthusiasm (though I wish he'd say more), plus the erudition of Gaedhal, who I'm on the mailing list of. I hear Mauricio's pretty sound also. I like people who call a spade a spade, and those who are ok with outright revolutionary speech (of 'the brigade' type etc. by analogy). I know who I don't like at least - not for their content, but for their lack of imagination/lack of radicalism. Is 'Chechar' 'sarky/toxic'? I see him more as just a very overworked person, perhaps flustered even (understandably - he's as sensitive as me), with the patience level natural to an old man. I've got annoyed at him a few times, to quite a pronounced degree. On re-evaluation it's always been my own fault - like me throwing a temper tantrum. He's kind of cryptic over that. I put it down to politeness. I got to the site a few years too late I think.
I might be barking up the wrong tree on this post, and I know you can't have known, but as I far as I can see from the UK, Russia's tentatively winning (well, it looks it). I was one of the ones hoping for a contained nuclear strike on Kiev. Nothing personal - I mean, I don't see individuals, as much as the 'cause'. I don't think anything the measly UK can splat out can really affect that too much, apart from raising the nuclear threat again (preferably I'd like London to go too).
I typed a late-as-ever second response to you on my own blog btw. Just going over old ground, plus a new speculation. I was curious, I suppose. Back to aetiologies.
Anyhow, I'll have a further browse round here another day this week and see if I can find something to add more directly related.
Keep up your writing.
Cheers,
BP
Wow, thanks, Benjamin, it's an undeserved honour to "meet" you here! I do think that I can't really be part of any category fully, and for good reasons. What's to say of my anti-natalist (pro-mortalist?) tendencies in the context of racism? Hell, what few folks I have talked to online since 2024, they have mostly been women - which is a mortal sin in C.T.'s perspective, too...
I must have specified it in the current blog entry, but I could recount it here, as well. My main issues with Chechar have been these so far:
1) he values the Aryan race purely as an aide to his idealistic morality - because it has proclivity to gentleness towards children and animals; this means his racism is contingent on certain arbitrary qualities of the race, and the race is only good as long as it adheres to his own vision what it should be;
(I myself would not be so arrogant and would rather focus on the objective issues such as worshipping a foreign god and breeding foreign nations)
2) in practice, it went with my questions: "What if Aryans are dying out due to hurting their kids less?" "What if cruelty to animals is the backbone of the triumphant Mongoloid race?" "Why breed Aryans to make the best suffer when the chances of a global victory over carnivorous animals are slim to none?"
(Add to that his unironic hatred of orca whales who are some of the most intelligent animals on the planet! Only because they supposedly "torture" seals! Although yes, I'm a sucker for intelligence myself, I even fed crows nuts at one point.)
3) and in more recent years, C.T. has gone off the rails listening to the likes of Tucker Carlson, Douglas Macgregor and Scott Ritter, who are obviously protected régime-grifters and should be treated no better than any randomly taken nigger.
> "Russia's tentatively winning (well, it looks it). I was one of the ones hoping for a contained nuclear strike on Kiev"
Now what is the issue here? The larger picture is that the Judaeo-Christian empire seems unable to kill its enemies properly - they cannot even exterminate the savages in Gaza. Still, they have been fairly successful in weakening the Russian military to a breaking point - with a possible invasion in sight ca. 2027-30? Again, not too sure if it would hurt the Russian race as the Putin régime is killing them with immigration and Christian feminist values much better than any war ever could - so by supporting a possible survival of the Aryan folk in Russia, I should also support a NATO invasion? Just how a US invasion of Iran would probably improve the people there? Case in point - Iraq and now Syria.
As to the hypothetical scenario of what the Kremlin could have easily done to impose its will, there are many pathways, none of which predispose killing a million of your best troops in a self-cucked tiny frontline in Donbass without destroying the Dnieper bridges, namely:
1) a bloodless police operation in 2014 which would have annexed the entirety of the Ukraine without a shot fired (maybe stopping at Ternopol due to the Austrian border);
2) a nuclear holocaust of all right-bank Ukrainian cities - which, granted, would be cruel, but it would also make the whole world respect Russia, show its resolve, improve the nuclear deterrent, and barely make a dent in the nuclear arsenal (which, incidentally, should have long since been expanded).
None of these options have been taken, and Russia is losing, no matter what the Jewish press might tell you. And no, the Ukraine's own position is irrelevant, because there are Poland, Romania, Germany, England and France, with an overwhelming air force and nuclear triad, ready to go just as eagerly as chemically castrating their kids.
In an alternate world, I would love to see Russia lose on racial grounds. But this world has grown so schizophrenic that I would love Russia lose because it would improve the position of the Russian people in their own country... And not because of liberal values...
All in all, I've been tired by this idiocratic nonsense. The best Russians such as Sofa Legion Strategist and Strelkov are calling Americans bloodthirsty when they are nothing but... The Jews are growing China, their peer competitor... The supposed right-wing backlash is led by lesbian Iranian women...
Me? I just want a peace deal to be fucked by escorts in Latvia, it's too retarded for me at this point.
Good day. I hope you're well. Thank you very much for your response. I read it all, and though, well I can't respond to everything - apologies for that. As I've wrote elsewhere recently, I'm doped to the gills on neuroleptics and they have a profound negative cognitive effect; it neuters the fine points of critical thinking. Besides, I'm not knowledgeable enough on politics in the Ukraine. Thank you for correcting me for your perspective.
I'll keep it brief today. As for the whole antinatalist perspective, I tend to refer to the idea, as I think has been covered on WDH that it's more of a stalling than a solution - life might evolve elsewhere; plus I'm not sure virus bombing the entire earth would succeed - life is tenacious. I'm an idealist in that also. I feel 'Tortian' exterminationism solves the problem, theoretically, as a tester to see if it can be solved elsewhere in future. Not of suffering, but of needless suffering, taken for a reviewed personal perspective in tandem with others. Yes, it is arrogant. I'm not sure how else to establish objectivity. One can argue arrogance also a classic trait of the racial intact Aryan, historically. 'Nothing can be done' does not sit well with my attitude of action.
Is is arbitrary or is there a modicum of free-will involved? As with discipline, kindness/compassion is honed. I'm not a genetic determinist - all the usual researchers on that sway me, but specifically I've currently re-reading Patrick D. Hahn. I haven't decided how arbitrary it is to pick Aryans (either). It's too instinctive to me. It was back to what I was saying on my antipsychiatry blog. It's something felt, or it isn't, like with art or Veganism or whatever (which, by the by, I'd say requires extreme discipline - it makes my weightlifting much harder, I am informed). It probably feels like a terrible cop out to explain it to someone who doesn't feel it, regardless of rationality, and perhaps cannot be achieved in words (which is my intuition).
I like intelligence in animals, and working it out, and spotting it (I only delved into encephalization quotients recently) but, as with humans (Aryans - take it as read when I write 'human' I mean the latter), there are other qualities in them I enjoy and am to some degree sustained by. I keep rabbits for example, and a hamster (plus a working dog and some small birds, though the latter are my girlfriend's and I hate them being caged up inside; she's not Vegan/animal ethicist). The more time I spend around them, the more meaningful the interactions become, and I extend that. Emotive warmth is one factor, manifesting as compassion in humans, albeit somewhat dilute by comparison. Resilience and willpower. Focus. Dedication. Love, even. Patience. Certainly pure hate (for those worth being only enemies). Intelligence alone sometimes feels hollow. Or intelligence and some other qualities (but not enough).
I watched the orca clips over and over again personally to decide on it. I baulked at it at first, thinking, 'hey, what's he on about?!' but the more I examined the blue whale calves and their reactions, the more more empathy came into play. Personally, I related it back to experiences I was more familiar with (unfortunately). Could carnivores be separated from prey without undue suffering, I wondered? Or, alternatively, are there evolutionary pathways that they may yet develop into and which we, by are myriad presence on this planet, are in the way of? I notice their survival of the fittest isn't good enough at the moment in that can't adapt fast enough to us (and this time I'll include the many billions of morons in that 'we'), and thus seem to have reached a stagnant evolutionary plateau. I say this as my dog, Skyler (a large Australian Shephard/Lurcher) doesn't really seem to go for meat with much enthusiasm, and indeed lives almost purely on fruits and vegetables. It's not something I've conditioned in him, although I noted it early on and try to match his wishes. A eugenics for animals so to speak, to stimulate (or cultivate) their omnivorous tendencies. I get the idea Cesar was against the orca not for the act of consuming the baby whale alive, which is the norm, excluding domestic pets, but for the sadistic element, as with his honey badgers and hyenas point. it seemed a great waste also just to go for the tongue.
By the way, I should be more used to blunt conversation. My girlfriend's diagnosed with autism (at least tentatively). I constantly 'weather' mental health/Veganism opinions; trying to explain the concept of human 'egg theft' from chickens the other day was tough - I said, look, you recognise it if squirrels or oviraptors do it, why not us? In return though, she doesn't really like me gleefully going on about the practical ins and outs of conducting escalating international genocide/planetary conquest, ha. Apart from that, I don't talk to women. One doesn't want to be sabotaged, basically (think Scarlett in Gone With the Wind). Besides, I don't get much out of them.
Oops... I must go. Talk to you later. I need to water my crops.
Regards,
BP
It's a pleasure talking to you, although I do hope C.T. comes back as he seems more fit to be in your company^^ The political situation is utterly insane, and especially in the Anglo part of cyberspace, stifling. Russians at least have their LiveJournal... Blogs I could recommend would be Rolo Slavskiy and Mikhailov, maybe Miguel-Kud.
https://slavlandchronicles.substack.com/
https://mikhailove.livejournal.com/
https://miguel-kud.livejournal.com/
I always wondered, how can you as a functioning adult be subjected to involuntary drugging? I don't really understand it. Although that you have sex makes me envy you even more - of course, it might be due to your age and sociability, but being touched by a woman is something I might never experience, and that's what's gnawing at my soul the most. Sure, it could be a fake mirage, but I will never know without trying, and as history shows, only female company can give me any inspiration whatsoever.
There is a Chinese girl who was travelling around Europe buying sheep and pigs to save them from slaughter - I wish Chechar saw that, haha... Although the girl in question is arguably feeble-minded, so can't be representative.
Psychohistory, a directed evolution of gentleness seems to me just one of the possible pathways? After all, Chechar himself considers the Aryan race in its deathbed - and if it does go extinct, along with its kindness, who are we to call Nature mistaken? (Unless "we" are the "god's" awakening self-consciousness.) But viewing anything in theistic or humanistic terms is weird to me. Why not view the Universe as a giant meat grinder of suffering? Why should pain even considered inconducive to the whole business?
See, I would naturally be much more dispassionate, observable, descriptive as opposed to prescriptive. Just as how in high school I was disgusted by the sexual stuff, BUT still considered it part of the natural inclinations of man - and thus would tolerate it as inevitable. But you as an Aryan would be familiar with the chemical castration that your idealism brings your kind so easily to^^ Prescriptionism is dangerous and artificial.
Vegetarianism that makes you weaker - isn't it ultimately an idealistic hurdle that decreases everyone's power and beauty? Sure, you could try to make it a rule worldwide, but would fist have to conquer the planet. And so far, the cat-boiling Chinese are the champions in this regard? If Strateg is to be believed, they have just now mastered the TSMC-style UV lithography. Go, chinks, go!
Re: intelligence, I would view it as indeed my supreme quality of preference. Nothing else really matters. Self-awareness is the quotient of soul. No reflection means the being in question is a machine-like golem. So what if my mom is kind if she cannot decide otherwise? If she's hopelessly programmed never to consider the alternative? I have many times offered her my suicide for her to emigrate to her beloved archipelago off the coast of Africa, yet she refuses. Even though I'm already an idle corpse.
Again, prescriptivism. You see Nature and you want to change it. How are you different from the Christians then? It's the Jews who want to remove all suffering and give us virtual reality with anime waifus. Maybe even induce a grey goo scenario, satisfying Chechar accidentally, who knows? Conversely, when I look at Nature, I understand that to survive, one must imitate it. And if you don't want to, then you can kill yourself - what the Jews are doing, with their schizo kindness to their own enemies such as Arabs and Chinese.
Apropos cruel females - see this Mongoloid beauty torturing a squid on YouTube.
https://old.bitchute.com/video/AWPRSquFcri8/
Unfortunately, no female will ever torture me, I can't even be rejected because I've never talked to anyone IRL aside from my mom and teachers...
A very good reply. I'm afraid this one will be even briefer in terms of direct responses. Thanks for the links - I'll delve into those. I don't spend as much time browsing the internet as I probably should. It's a bit of an eye-opener for me.
Basic note on prescriptivism and on changing Nature. I think I'd go with the 'well, we evolved with this cerebral ability to be idealistic'/'maybe teleologically-speaking Nature actively requires changing internally' argument, and it's just the time historically for that to occur, or at least, can be by the consciousness-driven decision of an evolved lifeform. The fact that an organism in Nature, and of Nature can enact change in Nature is thus rendered natural, being of Nature. It's a tough one, as, as you imply (I think), that argument validates any altering perspective, including degenerates. I suppose I'd have to be empirical and weight up how the herbivores would feel about it, and indeed the carnivores. Do they like suffering? Is it a lesser evil? If some mad freaky thing evolved that could stop that, would Nature's law be defiled? That's just me musing by the way. I still mull over teleology - from a natural perspective, mind - much as I toy with a non-Christian (etc.) cosmo-deism and a radical panentheism (which may mean the same fundamentally). Regardless, we're here for the moment. Whether something is moral or good or bad or whatever, it can be done and it may yet be done. I'll take it experimentally. I don't see this in many people at all; hence I hope from my perspective that those who don't manifest it can be pruned. They'd do best to wish the same of me. Like Hitler, I wouldn't push Veganism until victory, or at least partial victory (not necessarily planetary). Neanderthal extermination; speculative animals work; interstellar. I think it has to be in that order. Quite rich for one bloke sat in a room in Essex, I hear you say, ha!
Yeah, I flitter back and forth on it very occasionally, but never really put much thought to going extinct. That can be for then; otherwise it feels defeatist. I suppose that's hope. It solidifies as certainty. The will to win. The knowledge that we will. The desire to drive one's bountiful enemies into annihilation. The knee-jerk unconscious assumption on that. More than national warfare, I'm just dwindling away waiting for a currency/energy collapse (I know, I'm not very inventive!). I have no faith in the US, but a little in Europe/the UK (perhaps the UK more than continental Europe). I read your US civil war and Russian annihilation piece; I liked it.
I say 'dwindling'; I'm getting stronger physically monthly (or was up until last Summer, though I still work out despite it) and more honed mentally, an internal jihad, but it is rather boring. Maybe I am weaker not being a meatie anymore; I don't feel it. There's a sort of cleansing sensation I get now I didn't have before also. Cognitively it hasn't made any difference. I've got a tribunal tomorrow with a lawyer hired to fight for getting me off the drugs. When that inevitably fails, I have a few more organizations to try and utilize. Short of going lone wolf i.e. postal, which I feel wouldn't have been very effective beyond temporary satisfaction, I realised I had to submit. If not me, ultimately, others can fight this battle until I recover the means to extricate myself from State clutches. Regardless, what am I worth? That has yet to be seen, if at all. Even then, regardless, what? I wonder often how many others there are like me in the UK, busier perhaps, more subtle.
I wouldn't say my girlfriend tortures me as such (beyond what I can assume is the usual - I haven't dated heavily), but sex isn't really a priority. Despite my moaning on my own site, it was me who initially withdrew, so to speak, from the idea. I think I like her more as a mother to my stepson, and a home-maker. It's not a bitterness thing, I just grew out of it. There are better, more fulfilling things to do. I'm 39 by the way. Also, I'm not too social myself. I (on rare occasions) hang around with an infuriating bourgeois conservative type, and a young ex-Marxist, and can't really claim much more than that, bar the old pisshead ex-soldier round the corner I go and chat sh*t with now and again, or trade to. Aside from that, all my friends are dead. I don't wish for more real-life contact (bar what would be pragmatic in future times).
Out of interest, when you're inspired by hypothetical female company, what do you feel could then be achieved?
Incidentally, yeah, I hope Cesar comes back. it had crossed my mind briefly that perhaps it was a suicide ploy and he's made a convenient narrative to exit, in the works for quite a while, but I put that down to my own worries. He seemed in between the lines a littler lower/more doubtful recently, but again, that could very much be me projecting. I worry for him but he doesn't seem the type. I imagine his former life has imparted enough of a will to live.
Anyway, I really will leave you the day now. I tried watching the squid vid but I found the woman unattractive (I cannot find enemies pleasurable) and a bit sort of... immature maybe? I mean in terms of the tittering and exaggerated facial expressions. I go for people slightly older. I'm sterile too naturally, so I suppose one can be quite thankful I don't pass these genetics on, much as I don't believe heritability is all it's cracked up to be. Seriously though, I'm from a Norman family. I'm not sure I'd even count as Aryan by the most stringent classifiers. I'd glad the choice to be the last has been made for me, thus saving me a little willpower.
Cheers,
BP
Apologies for taking so long to respond.
1. Teleology - sure, it's not inherently unnatural, and deriving any conclusions is difficult as we don't know the future success of the present practices. I could be tempted to say that such behaviours as chemical castration of children, OR children rights are retarded because they are born of complete lunacy, with zero regard to any survival. But I won't. All I will say is that the Aryan race is sick in the head, and its track record demonstrates as much, as opposed to the Mongoloid race:
1) Germany? Lost like a rabid dog;
2) Russia? Lost twice in a century, now losing a third time;
3) America? Chemically castrates its children and refuses to kill its enemies, instead imports them.
Conversely, in the Mongoloid race:
1) China expunged all Abrahamics in Korea and Vietnam;
2) Korea is independent;
3) only Japan is a failure, but it was still fun while it lasted, and they had no chance anyway.
Ergo, everything coming from an Aryan mind is sick and useless to consider. It's a canine kind that will perish like dogs.
...Apologies for this harsh tone, I guess, I can't take seriously anything coming from Europe, especially not from the Anglosphere. To me, if a person speaks English, he's inherently homosexual. Russian isn't much better either at this point, they will constantly use Marxist memes (just now I've seen "we were moving for thousands of years towards ending slavery" - even though abolitionism is a sick English fetish like the chemical castration of children, or feminism).
I may be somewhat "orientalist" in my sensibilities, as I don't even speak Asian languages. But I'm vaguely aware that ISIS existed, that the Taliban have banned women from schools, that Juche Korea has been worshipping its divine line of Mangyongdae for 80 years now... And Japan poses an example of an actually traditional society, too, albeit occupied.
Just as how you cannot go reading English without vomiting, you can't go reading about Japan without a smile.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shimanaka_incident
It's surprising you're under 40, my impression was you were over 60. That's how it usually goes, just useless old boomers - and in Slavic lands, retarded Jewish golems.
Nothing realistic can be achieved in my life. I feel like I'm but a tourist here, renting my phimosis body from Allah. Under proper circumstances, I could have been a great diligent zealous Party official, even under Communism, would have been sent to Kalmykia to miscegenate. But in capitalism, I'm not interested in anything. Female company is merely a thing that I'd love to experience, but not sure if it would postpone my suicide.
There are a few points against my suicide - nuclear war, AGI singularity. But it's 2025 already, and neither has occurred. Your energy devolution thing seems pointless, too - wasn't it prophecised a long while ago? The dollar collapse was all the rage after the 2008 economic disaster, and that's 17 years ago. Sure, Chris Martenson was pointing to graphs on 2026, iirc, so maybe?
Chechar is too stupid / non-White to be suicidal, haha. Although chances are, he might be mutilated by the cartels. I wonder why he never mentions cartels, when they're all the rage on WatchPeopleDie. Always wanted to ask him how he may consider Latin America "blue-pilled" when its youth mutilate each other limb from limb. Seems rather glorious and masculine?
P.S. Why the hell would you ever take drugs? What are Anglo people like this? Isn't there any sentiment that poisoning your mind is bad? No wonder you chemically castrate children, what a disgusting kind...
That's ok, respond in your own time, naturally. I'm not going anywhere (well, bar jailing perhaps). Oh, just to clear up, no, I don't take drugs. I was referring to psych drugs (not that they're exactly chemically distinct). The only reason I acquiesce to those is because I was coerced into signing a community treatment order. If I don't, they haul me in under Police escort, pin me to the bed in restraints and stick them in anyway. So I signed it, as a stopgap whilst I work out how, whenever possible, to get them off my back. I'm imagining I might just have to come to terms with 2 subsequent years of hell and a lot of weary jumping through hoops. I'll get my revenge for that, served cold.
Maybe it's simple: the Aryan race is sick because it expends nigh on 100% of its warfare energy turning on itself. That's the story from year dot. Christianity's made that worse. If it could be made not to do that, I think there'd be a reckoning. A ramification is that it sets up enemies in cushy positions for their futures, not that we don't seem to do that separately also. I know we can at least war and kill, as we've done it to ourselves enough, with a suitable brutality at times. I'm not one just to hope/wait for Christianity to die out, given that neochristianity isn't going anywhere, and the two sustain each other (at least on the right). One hopes only for the short sharp shock. British people are inherent cowards, but I still think it reasonable that, for whatever muted reason or will, intolerable conditions will have a mechanical effect on stimulating their pushback spirit. I see most of them as totally expendable (just a big, quite angry, lump) but there's always a chance for a few to progress. They may not be effective, but if there's a temporary acknowledgement that they hate the government and its helpful community voters more than each other, then you've got a little potential. I don't think it's wise not to step in at that point though, lest they just go back to insular Hobbit bickering. Quite a lot are tougher than me, but they're simply not angry enough.
We have not yet reached universally intolerable conditions. There's no consensus. Anyone who thinks we have now is woefully pampered. I don't think they're too far off though (I'd imagine waves of dissent, brief lulls and troughs, and failed approaches, and always more embittered, and then just that gathering 'wham'). I don't usually think further afield than two decades, where I can be certain something will already have occurred. I'm sure, at that level, choice tends to disappear, and it's just actions, one being compelled by survival, whether they quite pay heed to it or not. Also, regardless of when it happens, the fiat money system is - theoretically at least, from its very structuring - bound to fail. I go with the Chris Martenson types too... Ray Dalio, MacLeod, etc. They get the dates wrong all the time, which infuriates me, but at vaguest conception, I think the idea itself is sound. Despite his drab, pretentious prose, it's Sebastian Ernst Ronin I'd accept over post peak-oil (prudently setting it at conservative estimate) not the mainstream theorists. Steve Goreham's book was an eye-opener on the nitty gritty of green energy also. Monitoring the sort of Zerohedge-tier normie comment sections with UK posters suggests in the wake of the David Betz speculations that UK citizens are at least getting bolder at being openly pissed off. There's a subtle change from before, say, how it was last year. A sudden genuine focus to the platitudes, as opposed to your average keyboard warrior. I'd say they're in general about 60% less hateful/rage-filled than this apocryphal revolutionary exterminationist type, and a good few years behind, but it's a start. The 10-15% group is at least simmering overtly, and realistically starting to boil in the background. Potential-wise, it's actually the 2% that frustrate/disappoint me more. I notice my private desires over actual responses and techniques of war are not as tame or polite as the majority - ok, everyone - I read on WDH, much as I don't share them, and won't be. If I had my way...
As I said before, my mind simply doesn't allow me to consider total defeat, but I think I'd appreciate discrete last stands, at that distant point, taken as something I can't really grasp. Desperation could help. Something memorable a least; a cautionary tale for whatever other Aryan groups take up the baton. I wish, just for empathy's sake that I could envisage defeat altogether for a few moments. I'm sorry though, I just can't. Not for a lack of imagination, but for an overabundance of optimism.
Yes, English is lazy of me. My Russian isn't good enough though. I'm still only a beginner at it (and very much not at a level to put that across). Another reason I thank you for some of the recent blog shares. I still read by sounding phonetically. If the trial goes well I'll return to it. I think German would be useful to me also, simply for some of the books I'd like to read. It both amuses and inspires me as a practical masculine language though. If the Whispering Leaves books take too long, I'll stick Spanish on that list, provided I have the time for it. Nothing non-European (as there's nothing I want to say to them). A young relative's got Romanian on the go. That or Serbian would be a future idealism. But I start small. I was fairly competent in Latin at one point, but that's gone now.
Yes, I find the chemical castration thing grotesque, totally. I blame the government medical complex (any other way to put the NHS?) bleeding heart types and the parents more than the nuts transsexual activists, who seem to just do what one would expect of them somehow, but I can't say I'm a fan of any of it. And that doesn't mean they get an excuse. Directly, none of my stepchildren are involved though, thankfully, and are not at an age/environment where that's a concern. It's not a topic I've ever had the mental energy to research too much. Too distasteful and enervating, but with worse I can spot at the same time, and then get carried away by instead. I suppose, probabilistically, do we want that many people having more children at the moment? it's not like it's making a huge long-term difference, and with the dark closing it, the historical conditions wouldn't be suitable for them. Taking my two decades cut-off pronouncement into account, I'm afraid we've basically got all we're going to get in terms of bodies to work with. I don't know enough about younger Zoomers to know whether there'll be too weak, anxious, conflict-avoidant and demoralised to instil warrior values, given their own halfway soppy parents.
I haven't got a problem with slaves per se, but I do wonder as to the quality of their work. Also, part of me would prefer we took the hard route and did it much more slowly, but by ourselves, though a home-grown approach to innovation. A bit more brainpower, but a more robust technological paradigm - AI wastes my time. I suppose, at consumer level (which is all I can see of it) it's designed to. This is a problem of mine with animal husbandry also. By all means take (biped) slaves for one generation or if you temporarily need them under inopportune conditions, but them just kill them all afterwards. Breeding them feels lazy, and sets them up for intergenerational bitterness and infinitesimal revolt, as well as providing a 'handy' public spectacle which there's always the chance a more sentimental element of your own group might take a shine to, hopeful abolitionists, or whatnot.
Sorry, I must go for the morning. Errands and minutiae. Thanks for the link. I'll read it later.
Cheers,
BP
PS. I respond quite quickly usually. Don't feel under any pressure to. I talk too much online at times, once someone gets me going, and it gives me time to mull over my own thoughts also. What I don't want is to be constructing an obligation 'text adventure'.
...They have been distorting and misrepresenting my views yet again. I wonder whether he has the integrity to let my response pass through, but anyway, this is just precious. Who in his right mind believes Putinian Russia to be able to win? And who would ever call the Ukraine "my country"? This isn't blind spots anymore, this is delirium. Which is fine, I'm not expecting much to begin with.
Take Elon's admission that his son got turned into a cute trap - like what side would that even hold currency with? The Western world has gone utterly retarded, big and small, all mad.
© Nik
https://westsdarkesthour.com/2024/07/22/on-wdh-commenters/#comment-30093
It continues to confuse me how Adunai and those like him (often called “Nazbols”) can admire Bolsheviks. Even purported National Socialists who defend Christianity are easier to understand, as they may have a superficial understanding of one ideology or both. But even the most superficial understandings of National Socialism or Bolshevism will show that they are fundamentally opposed to one another. What baffles me more is how aware Adunai is of Neo-Christianity, even though opposing Neo-Christianity while admiring Stalin is as nonsensical as opposing Christianity while admiring John Paul II.
© Chechar
https://westsdarkesthour.com/2024/07/22/on-wdh-commenters/#comment-30094
Good point. Over time I realised that Adunai wasn’t honest or consistent. For example, when various YouTube channels started saying that the official narrative of the war in Ukraine was bullshit, Adunai continued to believe that his country was going to beat the Russians, and didn’t understand why the Ukrainian army didn’t launch an offensive.
Self-deception, obviously.
...Considering that Chechar has decidedly not allowed my comment to pass, I will respond directly and tremendously - uselessly into the aether. No holds barred. Adult to adult, no kiddie gloves. Just put on some Chikoi the Maid, letting my mind drift to the memory of the dead Jap girl, and let us go.
> "how Adunai and those like him (often called “Nazbols”) can admire Bolsheviks."
Ideology is of little import to me. Incidentally, that is how I can pay moral respect to both ISIS and Juche - I have sufficient humility to understand that I do not know much about culture's efficacy aside from the fact that worshipping a dead Jewish angel of mercy is clearly and demonstrably collectively suicidal.
Hence calling me "Nazbol" is rather pointless. Why not "White Sharia"? Or Aryan Juche?
https://old.bitchute.com/video/v2DlFtxjHRPQ/
Let alone tying Stalin to this of all people? I literally never mentioned Stalin in any of my points in my life - aside from maybe admitting that female labour and immediate ruthless mobilisation saved Russia from certain annihilation.
But of course. this retard (Chechar, Nik seems only to draw from him like Mathew from Mark) is referring to my point contra Hellstorm Holocaust. Which has nothing to do with Stalin, and everything - with putting the crucified Germs in place of the crucified Jew. As I have legit never been abused in my childhood and view Christianity as dispassionately and distantly as Mongolian Lamaism, I don't have a yearning need for moaning about the dead.
Do not get me wrong, I respect the (worthy) dead viciously and loyally, yet I would rather focus on their glorious last stand and even scathing critiques of their failures than bitching about the sore wounds. In a word, Goodrich is saying, "The enemies of the Aryans are killing the Aryans". Fucking duh. Brain-damaged. Cannot build a culture around such an idiotic, obvious take.
> "But even the most superficial understandings of National Socialism or Bolshevism will show that they are fundamentally opposed to one another. What baffles me more is how aware Adunai is of Neo-Christianity"
Bolshevism is not neo-Christianity. Or at least it was an archaic neo-Christianity, to be more precise. Because right now, neo-Christianity has taken a form of insane, libertarian, woke anarchism. Whereas Bolshevism was an anti-racist, family-oriented Eurasian cult of the machine. Bolshevism has nothing to do with the modern American Protestant values of cuntboy rights. Hence putting it in the same category, while technically correct, would only hopelessly confuse our poor Nik.
> "when various YouTube channels started saying that the official narrative of the war in Ukraine was bullshit, Adunai continued to believe that his country was going to beat the Russians, and didn’t understand why the Ukrainian army didn’t launch an offensive."
> "Self-deception, obviously."
This is so ridiculous, I just can't.
1. First of all, Chechar has been consuming feces excreted by such brain-rotten chaps as Douglas MacGregor and Scott Ritter. The shit-faced morons who have been parading such laughable lies that only a dark-skinned Negro would buy them - or indeed a clueless NA boomer.
2. What official narrative, Chechar? Ritter & MacGregor are part thereof. The other side of the coin! They have not been blocked by YouTube. They enjoy an immense following. They are lying through their teeth. They are the prolefeed for the mentally challenged - or at least, to fill the lacunae of the otherwise decent folks (such as our one and only Chechar - when it comes to hating non-Europeans, at least).
3. Where in the actual fuck have I ever called _the_ Ukraine "my country"? Why would I call the Jews who want physically to vanquish my kind "mine"? My slave-owners? The reason why I will never commit hand-holding with a waifu, and can't even go outside anymore?
4. Where in the actual fuck did I ever call this a war between the Ukraine and Russia? My poëtic post of July 2022 presented it as America consuming the dead Russia's carcass with minimal resistance.
https://archive.vn/j7aQI
Now I might modify my views a tad - Sofa Legion Strategist (Strategos or Strategushka as I endearingly call him in my soliloquies) has been proven incorrect in his anticipation of a swift disarming nuclear strike against Russia, and so the Kremlin might continue being but another "pillar of Zion" as I christened it once. Whereas the ill-begotten Little Russian pseudonation is merely speedrunning collective suicide, catching up with the West, as Khrushchev bequeathed.
5. "didn’t understand why the Ukrainian army didn’t launch an offensive" - What is he even blabbering about? The Ukrainian army did launch two immensely successful offensives - at Kharkov and Kherson, in September and November 2022 respectively. The final times the frontline has moved at all. The summer 2023 offensives? They were pathetic failures. Just as the Russian pseudo-offensives at Lisichansk, Bakhmut and Avdeevka which nobody in his right mind would call successes or relevant to Russia's victory.
6. And now we're coming to the larger picture. I have been watching such clear-headed and knowledgeable (for idiotic Christians, beggars can't be choosers) Russians as Igor Strelkov (monarchist), Maxim Kalashnikov (Stalinist), Sofa Legion Strategist (bloodthirsty Day-of-the-Rope-style anarchist), Sergey Kurginyan (witch-hunting cult leader), and they have all been ringing the bells in panic regarding both the anarchic ineptitude and malicious sabotage of the Russian war effort's conduct by the latently pro-American flunkeys of capitalism and liberalism.
https://archive.vn/PcSf2
> "A couple of times he said that it might be a good idea for parents to burn their children alive in the context of ritual human sacrifice (cf. my book Day of Wrath)."
Yes, I did suggest that. In a spirit of free debate. I am humble enough to know what I do not know. And I do not know whether child sacrifice is not conducive to a nation's survival. What if it were? Checharian ideology would support collective suicide if it were proved to be so! And what's the point? See, that is why I cannot take Chechar seriously - why trade the same nihilistic self-destruction for another? I came to view racism as the only response to high-IQ nihilism (no, Christianity is not nihilistic, I disagree with Nietzsche in that nihilism effects any mass-men at all). And yet, here we're back at square one, spinning useless idealistic cobwebs aside from the simple motto of "fuck & kill" (in a collectivist fashion, Andrew-Tate-style anarchism is hysterical).
> "The answer is simple: if I am an exterminationist it is precisely because humans are cruel to animals (and many to their own children, as is clear from my trilogy in Spanish)."
Birthing those children, dooming them to this pitiful and uncomfortable incarnated existence is already an indefensible crime. And animals are nothing but stupid, vile machine bred to maim and destined to die in horrific torture - so what difference does it make who the torturer is? Blame the demiurge.
> "By the way, Adunai still lives in Ukraine. He is lucky he hasn’t been conscripted to fight against the Russians"
The Jew-obeying cucks have not been invading people's homes yet. My mom is saying they never will. So calm your tits, the system is slow and retarded. And, paraphrasing the Other Minister, unfortunately, the Aryans are even slower and incomprehesibly more retarded.
That is why I have nothing but scorn for this wretched continent, in ruins since 1945. Had three chances - and blew them all! The Mongoloid race has had a much better track record comparatively. Not that I would necessarily be thinking in terms of "the torch of civilisation". But I'm not hubristic to be a dog sitting on straw (a Little Russian saying).
https://archive.vn/Jt5TQ
Thanks! It's a reblog from Chechar's WDH. I do agree with Autisticus Spasticus in wishing for Chechar to be more reasonable and less snarky/toxic. What he's saying about the blind spots is painfully applicable to him, too. But that's apparently the way humans operate.
From the Russosphere, I could share the case when a middle-tier conspiracy theorist Miguel-Kud considered me a troll sent by some other blogger - despite my demonstrating my legit history going years back that has nothing to do with other bloggers.
https://miguel-kud.livejournal.com/346670.html?thread=20098862#t20098862
Or take all the Russian influencers such as Igor Strelkov, Maxim Kalashnikov, Mikhailove, Zadumov, Zhmilevskiy or Sofa Legion Strategos who hate one another's guts, squabbling over trivialities.